Here are the countries fighting Apple’s App Store monopoly
Apple has to prove that there’s no secure alternative to its system
Apple’s bite of the App Store
Apple first introducedthe 30% fee for in-app purchasessuch as subscriptions in 2011. As a result, some apps likeSpotify had to raise their priceson the App Store to offset Apple’s cut.
Sadly, these apps were not allowed to tell their customers about alternative payment options like subscribing to a premium plan on the web.
All that changed in the last few years. In 2020, the iPhone-maker reduced its cut from30% to 15% for developers making $1 million or under a year from their apps.
Last August, Apple allowed developers to communicate to its customers about alternative payment methods through email. But most people are likely to ignore these emails or don’t even open them at all. You can learn more about this debate onthis episodeof Vox media’sLand of the Giantspodcast.
That brings us to regulations across the world that might force Apple to let developers include other payment methods for digital purchases in their apps.
Alternative payments around the world
South Korea
Last year, South Korea became one of the first countries to introducea rule for mandatory alternative payment systemsfor Apple’s App Store and Google’s Play Store.
Earlier this month, Applesubmitted its compliance plansto the Korea Communication Commission (KCC)with service fee details — but the launch date for this new system is yet to be determined.
The Cupertino-based company said at that time the App Store supports more than 580,000 developers based out of South Korea, with more than 1.4 million apps available in the country’s store.
Japan
Last September, Appleagreed to settle an investigationby the Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC), and allow “reader” apps to include a link to third-party payment options on the App Store.
This doesn’t just cover apps that allow you to read books or magazines. It includes all digital magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, and video. So apps like Netflix and Spotify will be able to benefit from this ruling as well.
Inits press release, the company said it will release guidelines for developers early in 2022.
Netherlands
Over the weekend, Appleagreed to let dating apps in the Netherlands include alternative payment methodsafter the Netherlands’ Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) found the companybreaching the competition law.
The tech behemoth said that it’ll appeal the decision in a higher court, but has outlined a framework through which dating app developers can enable third-party payments in the country.
To do so, developers will need to create a separate binary file that will be distributed juston the Dutch App Store.
Russia
In October 2021, the Russian anti-competition watchdog opened ananti-trust case against Applefor failing to meet the September 30 deadline to allow alternative payment methods for developers.
Last December, Apple retorted by taking a legal routeagainst this judgmentand the jury’s not out yet.
US
In the Apple v Epic case,JudgeYvonne Gonzalez Rogers ordered the Tim Cook-led company to allow third-party in-app purchase methods. However, the firm gota last-gasp stay from the Ninth Circut Courtto get away with not enabling such an option.
Apart from this, a bipartisan bill introduced in August also wants to endApple and Google’s monopolies in the app store market.
Rest of the world
What is Apple’s defense?
Be itthe case against Epic, or talking to lawmakers in different countries, Apple has repeated the same concern: allowing alternative methods of payments or third-party app stores could be dangerous to users’ data privacy.
It releaseda wholeness whitepaperlast year to point out the security risks of doing that. The company has actively discouraged developers to adopt third-party systems. Just look at the text below from the announcement about dating app in the Netherlands:
What’s in it for you?
If alternative payment systems are allowed, it’s easier for customers like you and me to purchase in-app goods. Plus, developers of those apps might sell them at a lower rate than before. It’s also convenient for users who don’t know about non-App Store options to pay for apps or services.
The downside of that is that onus will lie on you and the app developer to weed out non-secure payment methods or purchases.
Apple won’t easily give up the hold on its carefully built system until lawmakers force it. This is an ever-evolving topic and we could see many more anti-trust probes across the world.
We’ll keep an eye on them and keep refreshing this story with new updates.
Story byIvan Mehta
Ivan covers Big Tech, India, policy, AI, security, platforms, and apps for TNW. That’s one heck of a mixed bag. He likes to say “Bleh.“Ivan covers Big Tech, India, policy, AI, security, platforms, and apps for TNW. That’s one heck of a mixed bag. He likes to say “Bleh.”
Get the TNW newsletter
Get the most important tech news in your inbox each week.
